VAL: Interactive Task Learning with GPT Dialog Parsing
Authors
Human-LLM CollaborationAI-Assisted Decision-Making & AutomationSoftware Engineers & DevelopersAI/ML Researchers & Engineers
Title of the Paper
VAL: Interactive Task Learning with GPT Dialog Parsing
Paper Information
- Field of Study: Human-Computer Interaction, Task Learning, Natural Language Processing
- Keywords: Hierarchical Task Networks, GPT, Large Language Models (LLMs), Neuro-Symbolic AI, Hybrid AI
Research Background and Problem
- Background:
- Interactive Task Learning (ITL) is a method for incrementally acquiring task knowledge through natural human interaction, aiming to enable computers to learn general-purpose tasks from human instruction via language.
- Existing ITL systems rely on syntactic-semantic parsing, which often results in unnatural interactions and fragility due to parsing errors. Large Language Models (LLMs) are more flexible in semantic understanding but lack incremental learning capabilities and interpretability.
- Problem or Challenge:
- How to combine the advantages of LLMs with the transparency and scalability of classical symbolic learning to achieve ITL.
- The fragility of language parsing in current ITL systems makes it difficult to support complex and natural conversational scenarios.
- Insufficient capabilities in coreference resolution, semantic ambiguity handling, and task generalization from language.
- Significance of Research:
- Advancing ITL systems to enable natural language interaction with humans while maintaining interpretability and generalizability.
- Improving human-computer interaction experiences, making generalization and human guidance feasible.
- Research Motivation: Proposing an effective neuro-symbolic hybrid framework to address the aforementioned challenges.
Solution
-
Proposed Method:
- Develop an ITL system named VAL (Verbal Apprentice Learner) that combines GPT-family LLMs with a symbolic task learning framework.
- The system focuses on learning hierarchical task knowledge through natural language dialogue, leveraging LLMs for specific subtasks (e.g., predicate selection) rather than relying on LLMs end-to-end.
-
Innovations:
- Unique neuro-symbolic hybrid architecture:
- Utilize GPT for semantic parsing and subtask processing in dialogues (e.g., predicate extraction and parameter selection).
- Represent task structures using classical Hierarchical Task Networks (HTN).
- Reduce cascading errors and improve interaction usability through confirmation dialogues and undo operations.
- Enable incremental learning and task generalization, supporting teaching through natural language dialogue.
- Provide user-friendly visualization of task knowledge.
- Unique neuro-symbolic hybrid architecture:
-
Implementation Steps:
- Use the "VALgorithm" algorithm to structure natural language input:
- Decompose user input into atomic steps;
- Employ GPT for predicate matching, parameter mapping, and validation.
- Provide a Hierarchical Task Networks (HTN) framework to learn task hierarchies.
- Implement error correction through a user interaction confirmation interface.
- Design a real-time interactive interface for user teaching and task monitoring.
- Test the system's learning performance in video game environments (e.g., Overcooked-AI).
- Use the "VALgorithm" algorithm to structure natural language input:
Research Outcomes
- Specific Results:
- The VAL system can incrementally learn complex hierarchical task structures through minimal natural language interaction (e.g., tasks in the Overcooked game).
- Offers intuitive knowledge representation (e.g., real-time visualization and confirmation dialogue interface), enhancing user experience.
- Advantages:
- Compared to existing ITL systems, VAL significantly improves robustness in handling grammatical errors, unnatural expressions, and ambiguous language.
- Combines LLMs' strengths in flexible language understanding with the interpretability of HTN-based symbolic learning.
- Supports richer and more natural user interaction, optimizing user engagement.
- Experimental Results:
- In a user study involving 12 participants, VAL demonstrated the ability to complete most task learning scenarios.
- Users generally described the system as "easy to use" and "natural," though frequent confirmation dialogues were noted as potentially tedious.
- High average accuracy was observed across different submodules, particularly in input segmentation and parameter mapping.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Frequent confirmation dialogues increase user fatigue; future work could aim to reduce unnecessary confirmations.
- Enhance environmental awareness and automatic task generation to reduce user teaching burden.
- Expand VAL's capabilities to other task modules and multimodal interactions (e.g., visual and gesture-based).
- Replace commercial LLMs with open-source models to improve system transparency and scalability.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can LLMs' semantic understanding be combined with the transparency and scalability of classical symbolic learning to improve interactive task learning (ITL) systems?Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can the fragility of existing semantic parsing be reduced and interaction experience improved for complex natural language dialogue scenarios?Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can hierarchical task knowledge be incrementally learned and tasks generalized through natural language dialogue?Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Existing systems struggle to learn complex tasks through natural interaction, resulting in poor interaction experience.Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Comparing Sentence-Level Suggestions to Message-Level Suggestions in AI-Mediated Communication
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 100%
Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Competent but Rigid: Identifying the Gap in Empowering AI to Participate Equally in Group Decision-Making
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted Programming
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
Automatic Macro Mining from Interaction Traces at Scale
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
"If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I?" – How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and Accomplishment
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
GenComUI: Exploring Generative Visual Aids as Medium to Support Task-Oriented Human-Robot Communication
CHI '25· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 80%
New Enactions of Expertise: Software Engineers’ Evaluation and Demonstration of Coding Expertise with AI Coding Assistants
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3641915
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Human-LLM Collaboration, AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation
work
Professions
Software Engineers & Developers, AI/ML Researchers & Engineers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers