RelieFab: Gradual-Depth 2.5D Texture Prototyping using a Laser Cutter
Authors
We propose RelieFab, a rapid prototyping method that produces 2.5D textured surfaces with gradual depth transitions. Conventional rapid prototyping methods using a laser cutter can quickly cut out parts for 3D prototypes, but their surfaces can only be flat and smooth. 3D printing offers detailed textures but is time-consuming. Our method enables the rapid creation of objects with finely detailed gradual-depth 2.5D textured surfaces, distinguishing it from conventional binary engraving using a laser cutter. By applying localized high-density energy from a laser cutter to low thermal conductivity polystyrene foam, the laser cutter can selectively remove only the specifically targeted parts of the surface of the polystyrene foam. We have built a computational model and conducted experiments to determine the appropriate laser parameters to accurately and stably remove the polystyrene foam. By utilizing the appropriate laser parameters derived from this process, we can demonstrate applications, including haptic textures and visual translucency.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
AutoAssembler: Automatic Reconstruction of Laser-Cut 3D Models
UIST '21· Laser Cutting & Digital Fabrication +1
- 67%
Handheld Tools Unleashed: Mixed-Initiative Physical Sketching with a Robotic Printer
CHI '23· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +2
- 60%
Unmaking: Enabling and Celebrating the Creative Material of Failure, Destruction, Decay, and Deformation
CHI '21· Shape-Changing Materials & 4D Printing +1
- 60%
PaperTouch: Tangible Interfaces through Paper Craft and Touchscreen Devices
CHI '24· Shape-Changing Materials & 4D Printing +1
- 60%
The Development and (Mis)appropriation of a Digital Kit for Jewellers
DIS '25· Shape-Changing Materials & 4D Printing +1
- 60%
DefeXtiles: 3D Printing Quasi-Woven Fabric via Under-Extrusion
UIST '20· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)