Perceptions of Interaction Dynamics in Co-Creative AI: A Comparative Study of Interaction Modalities in Drawcto
Authors
This paper explores how different interaction modalities with AI agents affect human perception of the co-creative process. We utilize the Wizard of Oz methodology within Drawcto, a co-creative drawing system, to examine co-creativity across three scenarios: human-human, human-robot, and human-software interactions. Using a mixed-methods approach, we combined insights using the Observable Creative Sensemaking (OCSM) method with data from structured interviews. The study involved 20 participants engaging in a collaborative drawing task under each interaction scenario. Key findings reveal an average OCSM curve indicative of typical human-human interactions, varied themes in human-AI collaboration, and a notable influence of AI embodiment on participant perceptions, with the robot interface resembling human-human collaboration more closely than the software interface. Overall, this research offers valuable insights into how different interaction modalities influence the perceived role of AI in the co-creative process and provides design considerations for enhancing human-AI co-creative interactions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities
CHI '22· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 75%
No Evidence for LLMs Being Useful in Problem Reframing
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 75%
Ai.llude: Investigating Rewriting AI-Generated Text to Support Creative Expression
C&C '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 75%
Do LLMs Meet the Needs of Software Tutorial Writers? Opportunities and Design Implications
DIS '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 75%
Beyond Text Generation: Supporting Writers with Continuous Automatic Text Summaries.
UIST '22· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
Enhancing the Composition Task in Text Entry Studies: Eliciting Difficult Text and Improving Error Rate Calculation
CHI '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
Speeding up Inference with User Simulators through Policy Modulation
CHI '22· Human-LLM Collaboration
- 67%
Timing Matters: How Using LLMs at Different Timings Influences Writers' Perceptions and Ideation Outcomes in AI-Assisted Ideation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
Wordcraft: Story Writing With Large Language Models
IUI '22· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototyping
UIST '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)