Efficient and safe interactions between automated vehicles and other road users can be supported through external Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMI). The success of these interactions relies on the eHMI signals being adequately understood by other road users. A paired-comparison forced choice task (Task 1), and a 6-point rating task (Task 2) were used to assess the extent to which ten different eHMI signals conveyed three separate messages, ‘I am giving way’, ‘I am in automated mode’ and ‘I will start moving’. The different eHMI options consisted of variations of a 360° lightband, a single lamp, and an auditory signal. Results demonstrated that the same eHMI format could convey different messages equally well, suggesting a need to be cautious when designing eHMI, to avoid presenting misleading, potentially unsafe, information. Future research should investigate whether the use of an eHMI signal indicating a change in the AV’s behaviour is sufficient for conveying intention.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/auto_ui/5115/2019

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
AutoUI
calendar_month
Year
2019
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
9 authors
sell
Subtopics
External HMI (eHMI) — Communication with Pedestrians & Cyclists
work
Professions
Pedestrians & Vulnerable Road Users
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers