We review the state of open science and the perspectives on open data sharing within the automotive user research community. Openness and transparency are critical not only for judging the quality of empirical research, but also for accelerating scientific progress and promoting an inclusive scientific community. However, there is little documentation of these aspects within the automotive user research community. To address this, we report two studies that identify (1) community perspectives on motivators and barriers to data sharing, and (2) how openness and transparency have changed in papers published at AutomotiveUI over the past 5 years. We show that while open science is valued by the community and openness and transparency have improved, overall compliance is low. The most common barriers are legal constraints and confidentiality concerns. Although research published at AutomotiveUI relies more on quantitative methods than research published at CHI, openness and transparency are not as well established. Based on our findings, we provide suggestions for improving openness and transparency, arguing that the motivators for open science must outweigh the barriers. All supporting materials are freely available at: https://osf.io/zdpek/

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/auto_ui/168468/2024

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
AutoUI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
9 authors
sell
Subtopics
Research Ethics & Open Science
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Cognitive Scientists
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
6 related papers