Link and label wording directly determines scent strength
Aliases: link wording · label design · cue density
What it is
Information scent is composed mostly of visible text: navigation words, link sentences, page titles, meta descriptions, button labels, filter values, and result snippets. Overlap with task words, specificity, and semantic distance directly determine whether users click.
Why it happens
“Resources,” “center,” and “more” provide only weak category cues; “Download the 2026 expense form” or “View unpaid orders” provides object, action, and state. Surrounding context also modulates meaning: the same word under “Invoices” differs from “Equipment.” Without user synonyms, the correct destination hides behind a weak label.
Where it stops holding
Keyword stuffing creates noise, ambiguity, and distrust; scent must stand out among competing cues, not be longest. Multilingual, regional, and professional terms require separate calibration. Icons and visual salience attract attention but cannot replace interpretable text.
Applying it
- Extract label words from search logs, support tickets, and card sorting; retain frequent task terms.
- Make each link state object, action, scope, or time, such as “Export this month’s unshipped orders.”
- Test users’ predicted destination from each label; rewrite when prediction mismatches content.
- Configure aliases, related searches, and cross-links for important destinations rather than one weak entry.
Related
- Same group: B4.09.1 Users follow paths according to information scent · B4.09.2 Weak scent leads to abandonment rather than deeper search · B4.09.4 The theory borrows optimal-foraging models and explains path choice by benefit-to-cost ratio · B4.09.5 Users leave an information patch only when its yield falls below the environment’s average · B4.09.6 Scent is a subjective judgment of cues and may mismatch true relevance · B4.09.7 Increasing cue density and shortening path length are different interventions with noninterchangeable effects · B4.09.8 The theory explains abandonment and retreat, not why the goal arose
- Nearby: T1 Interface Copy and Content · G1 Navigation and Information Architecture
- Search terms:
link wording·label design·scent strength
Cards in the same group
- B4.09.1Users follow paths according to information scent
- B4.09.2Weak scent leads to abandonment rather than deeper search
- B4.09.4The theory borrows optimal-foraging models and explains path choice by benefit-to-cost ratio
- B4.09.5Users leave an information patch only when its yield falls below the environment’s average
- B4.09.6Scent is a subjective judgment of cues and may mismatch true relevance
- B4.09.7Increasing cue density and shortening path length are different interventions with noninterchangeable effects
- B4.09.8The theory explains abandonment and retreat, not why the goal arose