The result concerns small short-term sets, not long-term retrieval
Aliases: long-term memory retrieval · retrieval cue
What it is
Evidence for memory-scanning law comes from small, discrete items just presented and still held in short-term memory. It does not imply that retrieving facts, names, or skills from long-term knowledge slows linearly with the total amount remembered. Long-term retrieval often uses cue-driven association, pattern recognition, and direct retrieval.
Why it happens
Short-term items form a relatively active, comparable task set. Long-term memory is not one fully activated list waiting for serial inspection; retrieval depends on cue diagnosticity, semantic organisation, familiarity, and interference. The processes therefore do not share one slope model.
Studying it
Use brief small-set presentation and short delay for a scanning paradigm. To study long-term retrieval, manipulate cues, learning history, semantic relation, and retention interval, then measure recall, recognition, and error type. Do not fit these different retention systems to one reaction-time–set-size line.
Where it stops holding
Short- and long-term memory are not absolute compartments: practice changes representation and complex material can be chunked. Familiar sequences can recruit long-term knowledge in a short-term task, while working-memory load affects long-term retrieval. State retention conditions and available cues rather than classifying by material count alone.
Related
- Same group: B1.06.1 Judging membership in a memory set takes longer linearly as the set grows · B1.06.2 Scanning is exhaustive rather than self-terminating · B1.06.3 The finding concerns memory judgment, not visual search · B1.06.4 Reaction time rises by tens of milliseconds per remembered item · B1.06.5 Similar slopes for yes and no responses indicate exhaustive scanning · B1.06.7 Using the law to set an interface-option limit is a cross-paradigm error
- Nearby: B1.07 Power law of practice · B1.04 Hick-Hyman law
- Search terms:
short-term memory scanning·long-term memory retrieval·retrieval cue
Cards in the same group
- B1.06.1Judging membership in a memory set takes longer linearly as the set grows
- B1.06.2Scanning is exhaustive rather than self-terminating
- B1.06.3The finding concerns memory judgment, not visual search
- B1.06.4Reaction time rises by tens of milliseconds per remembered item
- B1.06.5Similar slopes for yes and no responses indicate exhaustive scanning
- B1.06.7Using the law to set an interface-option limit is a cross-paradigm error